Abu Dhabi Mother Fined Dh80,000 After Leaving Child With Nanny While Father Was Available.
An Abu Dhabi court has upheld an Dh80,000 fine against a mother who left her young daughter with a nanny for eight days while the child’s father was available to care for her.

An Abu Dhabi mother has been ordered to pay Dh80,000 after leaving her young daughter with a nanny for eight days while travelling abroad, despite the girl's father being in the UAE and willing to take care of her.
The Abu Dhabi Civil Family Court found that the arrangement breached the parents' joint-custody responsibilities and raised concerns about the child's safety. The mother challenged the decision, but the Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal rejected her appeal, leaving the fine in place.
The case involved divorced parents who share joint custody of their daughter. According to the court account reported by Khaleej Times, the father told the court that he had been available throughout the mother's eight-day absence and had offered to look after the child himself. Instead, the mother left the girl in the care of a nanny while she travelled outside the country.
The court's concern went beyond the decision to use a nanny. It found that the circumstances surrounding the child's care raised additional safety issues. During the mother's absence, the girl was reportedly staying in the same room as an unrelated adult man. She was also scratched by a cat and subsequently had to begin a course of rabies vaccinations. The mother did not dispute that the incident occurred.
The court ultimately concluded that, given the joint-custody arrangement and the father's availability, the mother should have entrusted the child to her co-parent rather than leaving her with hired care while she was abroad.
The Dh80,000 penalty was calculated at Dh10,000 for each of the eight days the mother was away. However, the judgment does not establish a general rule that parents will automatically be fined Dh10,000 for every day they leave a child with a nanny. The court's calculation was a remedy specific to the circumstances of this case.
The legal basis for the decision is Abu Dhabi's civil family framework. Article 40 of Resolution No. 8 of 2022 allows courts to impose financial penalties where a parent fails to comply with joint-custody arrangements or with a judicial order or measure. The law gives the court discretion over the amount and manner of imposing such a fine.
The ruling also sets out expectations for the parents going forward. If the mother travels while the father remains in the UAE, the child is to be placed in his care rather than left with hired help. If she wishes to take the child abroad, she must obtain the father's consent or judicial permission. The court also ordered that the child should not be left without the care of at least one parent.
The court warned that the financial penalty would double if the conduct were repeated, while the existing joint-custody arrangement itself remains unchanged.
Legal advocate Byron James, a partner at Expatriate Law, cautioned against interpreting the judgment as a blanket prohibition on nannies. His assessment, as reported by Khaleej Times, was that the central issue was the mother's decision to leave the country for eight days when the other parent was available and willing to assume responsibility for the child.
That distinction is important for parents living under joint-custody arrangements. The case does not say that employing domestic help is inherently unlawful or that every parent who travels must face a financial penalty. Instead, it highlights the legal responsibilities that can arise when separated parents share custody and one parent makes childcare arrangements that bypass an available co-parent.
The ruling is also a reminder that family-court disputes can turn on circumstances that might appear routine outside the courtroom. For parents sharing custody, decisions about travel, childcare and who takes responsibility for a child can have legal consequences, particularly where court orders or statutory joint-custody rights are involved.
Ultimately, the case places the child's welfare at the centre of a wider question about how joint custody works in practice. The court's message is that shared parental responsibility is not merely a formal arrangement: when one parent is unavailable and the other is ready to care for the child, that relationship can carry practical legal weight. For families navigating separation in the UAE, the ruling underlines the importance of clear communication, compliance with custody arrangements and obtaining the necessary consent or court approval before making significant decisions involving a child.
More on Law/Legal

Law/Legal
Tunisia’s Top Court Upholds Convictions of Opposition Figures and Activists
4 Sept 2026
Law/Legal
Ex-Liberia Vice President Remanded in Prison as Drug Trafficking Case Moves to Court
26 Aug 2026

Law/Legal
Dolly Parton’s Estate Seeks Court Order Against Nephew Over Alleged Threats
23 Sept 2026

Law/Legal
Paris Court Awards Kim Kardashian €1 in Landmark 2016 Robbery Case
16 Sept 2026
Law/Legal
Supreme Court Blocks Trump's Mail-In Voting Plan Ahead of US Midterm Elections
15 Sept 2026
You may also like

Law/Legal
Poco Lee's UK Court Pre-Trial Adjourned Until February 2027
14 Sept 2026

Law/Legal
UK Court Grants Poco Lee Bail Ahead of Tuesday Hearing
14 Sept 2026

Law/Legal
Tinubu FBI Files: US Court Allows Secret Evidence as Disclosure Fight Deepens
27 Aug 2026
Law/Legal
Joseph Kabila Challenges US Sanctions in Washington Court
24 Aug 2026

Law/Legal
Brad Pitt Seeks Court Order as Miraval Legal Battle with Angelina Jolie Deepens
5 Aug 2026

Law/Legal
UK Prosecutors Confirm Poco Lee’s Case Is Still Active
13 Sept 2026