California is once again at the epicenter of a national political storm after U.S. President Donald Trump deployed thousands of federal troops to Los Angeles to quell growing protests sparked by a sweeping immigration enforcement campaign. California Governor Gavin Newsom has condemned the move as “deranged” and authoritarian, launching a legal challenge over the president’s unilateral military intervention.
Federal Forces Surge into LA
What began last Friday as peaceful demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Latino neighborhoods has escalated into four days of street protests, violent confrontations, and sweeping arrests across Los Angeles and other major U.S. cities.
In response, the Trump administration doubled the National Guard presence in Los Angeles from 2,000 to 4,000 troops and deployed 700 Marines from the 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines based at Twentynine Palms, California. According to the U.S. military, these Marines will focus on protecting federal property and personnel, including immigration officers and detention facilities.
The decision to send troops without the governor’s consent marks the first such action by a U.S. president since 1965. Critics argue that this bypasses long-held norms and constitutional boundaries, raising questions about the federal government’s role in domestic law enforcement.
Newsom vs. Trump: A Legal and Political Clash
Governor Gavin Newsom did not mince words, calling the deployment “the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial president.” His administration has filed a lawsuit claiming the president violated constitutional limits by sending troops into California without state authorization.
“This is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,” Newsom said on social media. “We will not stand by while our state’s sovereignty is trampled and our communities terrorized.”
He also warned that the state is preparing a separate legal challenge to the Marine deployment, arguing that the role of active-duty military in civilian policing—absent a declared emergency—is both legally dubious and historically rare.
Trump’s Justification: ‘No Choice’ But Force
President Trump defended his decision at a White House press conference, pointing to scenes of chaos across Los Angeles: self-driving cars torched, rocks hurled at law enforcement, major highways blocked by demonstrators, and ICE facilities under siege.
“You watch the same clips I did—cars burning, people rioting,” Trump said. “We stopped it. I feel we had no choice.”
He also used social media to issue a fiery warning to protesters:
“IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before.”
His aggressive rhetoric drew immediate backlash, with critics accusing him of inciting violence rather than calming tensions. Yet Trump remained resolute, suggesting that Governor Newsom should even face arrest for “obstructing” federal immigration enforcement—an idea his own border advisor Tom Homan declined to endorse publicly.
Protests Escalate, Legal Questions Multiply
Despite the troop surge, protests have continued in Los Angeles and spread to at least nine other cities, including New York, Philadelphia, Dallas, San Francisco, and Austin.
On Monday night, clashes escalated outside a federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles. Police fired stun grenades, rubber bullets, and tear gas to disperse demonstrators. The LAPD reported that some protesters threw cinder blocks and Molotov cocktails, with others attempting to breach federal property lines.
According to the LAPD, 50 individuals were arrested over the weekend, facing charges ranging from vandalism and looting to attempted murder and assault on officers. More than 600 rubber bullets and other non-lethal munitions were reportedly used by law enforcement.
Federal prosecutors also revealed the identity of Elpidio Reyna, a man accused of throwing rocks at federal agents, who will be added to the “Most Wanted” list. A search warrant was executed at his home.
LA Officials Push Back: ‘Deliberate Chaos’
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass condemned the federal deployment as “a deliberate attempt to sow disorder.” She said her office had identified at least five ICE raids across the city on Monday alone—including one near her grandson’s school.
“We have a right to question federal overreach,” Bass told reporters. “This is not about law and order. It’s about political theater—and our city is the stage.”
District Attorney Nathan Hochman echoed that sentiment in an interview with BBC Radio 4, insisting that local law enforcement had not reached a breaking point:
“We have not reached the point where local law enforcement has got beyond its means to deal with the situation. Most protesters are peaceful.”
Broader Implications and Constitutional Tensions
Legal scholars say the standoff between Newsom and Trump could set a precedent for federal-state relations, particularly when it comes to military intervention on U.S. soil.
While the president has not yet invoked the Insurrection Act, a rare federal power that allows direct military involvement in civilian law enforcement,the current troop deployment already tests the boundaries of presidential authority.
Historically, military deployments within the U.S. have been reserved for responses to major natural disasters or terror events, such as Hurricane Katrina or the aftermath of 9/11. Using federal troops against civil protest, without the consent of a state governor, remains legally and ethically contentious.
A Political Firestorm Heading Into 2026
With the 2026 midterms on the horizon, Trump’s aggressive immigration crackdown and willingness to use military force may further polarize the American electorate. His administration insists it is restoring law and order, but critics argue it is a calculated move to inflame his base.
Meanwhile, Newsom’s legal fight has made him a leading national voice in resistance to what many see as Trump’s increasingly authoritarian style of governance.
Both men are now locked in a high-stakes battle that goes far beyond California—touching on constitutional law, civil rights, immigration policy, and the very role of government in times of crisis.
Written By Joe Brens
Subscribe to Follow Global Trends for daily global news.
Find Out How To Make Money As A Full-Time Writer/Blogger Guide.
To Advertise or Publish A Press Release, send a mail to info.followglobaltrends@gmail.com
Related Articles
Maldives imposes complete entry ban on citizens from Israel to protest Gaza war
US Judge Rules Mahmoud Khalil Can Be Deported Over Protests
Elon Musk’s Potential Involvement in UK Politics Raises Concerns
