In a gripping courtroom session on Wednesday, May 7, 2025, the Federal High Court in Abuja was the scene of high-stakes legal drama as the trial of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), continued with intense scrutiny over his past words and actions.
The Federal Government’s prosecution team came armed with a collection of “Radio Biafra” broadcasts and video clips, playing them publicly in court as part of their evidence to support terrorism charges against Kanu. The materials, admitted as exhibits, were presented through the second prosecution witness, known only by the initials “BBB,” before Justice James Omotosho.
The recordings, many made during times of heightened tension like the 2020 EndSARS protests, featured Kanu’s fiery rhetoric, including strong condemnations of Fulani herdsmen violence and sharp criticisms of South-East governors. One clip reportedly captured him accusing Nigerian leaders of abandoning their people, with direct jabs at political heavyweights like Imo State Governor Hope Uzodinma and the current Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wekay.
But was it incitement or political commentary?
That’s the heart of the courtroom clash. The prosecution argued that Kanu’s broadcasts were more than words—they were calls to violence, pushing a secessionist agenda. However, Kanu’s defense team, led by respected legal giant Chief Kanu Agabi (SAN), pushed back hard, saying the broadcasts were constitutionally protected speech expressing political dissent.
Under cross-examination, the prosecution witness confirmed Kanu’s identity in the clips but stumbled when pressed on the specifics of certain charges—admitting, rather awkwardly, that some had already been dismissed by the court.
Another flashpoint? The controversial 2017 proscription of IPOB. The defense didn’t challenge the admission of the proscription order but pointed out that it was granted through an ex parte motion—meaning IPOB had no legal representation at the time.
The session also revealed previously unseen documents, including a letter from a former Attorney General ordering Kanu’s arrest. The defense cried foul, claiming they were never served the document, prompting Justice Omotosho to emphasize the court’s obligation to ensure fair hearing and due process.
With the courtroom still buzzing from the day’s developments, the trial was adjourned to Thursday, May 8, for further cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses.
Written By Queen Diana Story
Subscribe to Follow Global Trends for daily global news.
Find Out How To Make Money As A Full-Time Writer/Blogger Guide.
To Advertise or Publish A Press Release, send a mail to info.followglobaltrends@gmail.com
Related Articles
FG Plays Nnamdi Kanu’s Broadcasts and Videos in Court to Support Terrorism Charges
Judge Bars Nnamdi Kanu’s In-Law from Court Over Live Video Broadcasts
Court Approves Use of Masked Witnesses in Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial
IPOB: Nnamdi Kanu Asserts Freedom Fighting as His Fundamental Right in Court
