Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Executive Order to Dismantle Education Department

On May 22, 2025, U.S. District Judge Myong Joun issued a preliminary injunction blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at dismantling the U.S. Department of Education. The ruling mandates the reinstatement of over 1,300 employees who were laid off as part of the administration’s plan to reduce the department’s workforce. Judge Joun determined that such significant changes to a federal agency require congressional approval, and the mass layoffs would likely “cripple” the department’s ability to fulfill its statutory obligations .

The Administration’s Plan and Legal Challenges

In March 2025, President Trump signed an executive order directing the closure of the Department of Education, aiming to return control of education to state and local governments. This directive led to the termination of approximately half of the department’s workforce. The administration argued that the restructuring was intended to improve efficiency and reduce bureaucratic overhead. However, the move faced immediate legal challenges from Massachusetts school districts, the American Federation of Teachers, and a coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general, who contended that the layoffs hindered the department’s ability to manage student loans, enforce civil rights protections, and support special education programs .

Judge Joun’s Ruling

Judge Joun, appointed by former President Joe Biden, criticized the administration’s portrayal of the plan as a mere “reorganization,” stating that it was, in effect, an attempt to dismantle the department without legislative authorization. He emphasized that such significant changes require congressional approval and that the layoffs would impede the department’s ability to serve vulnerable student populations. The judge’s decision halts the implementation of the executive order and orders the reinstatement of the affected employees .

Administration’s Response and Next Steps

In response to the ruling, the Trump administration expressed its intention to appeal the decision. Education Secretary Linda McMahon defended the layoffs as lawful and aligned with the administration’s goals. The administration criticized the ruling as judicial overreach and vowed to continue its efforts to restructure the department .

Broader Implications

The court’s decision underscores the constitutional principle of separation of powers, affirming that significant changes to federal agencies must be authorized by Congress. The ruling also highlights the importance of judicial oversight in ensuring that executive actions comply with legal and constitutional standards. As the case progresses through the appeals process, it may set important precedents regarding the scope of executive authority and the protection of federal employees’ rights.

Written By Fortune Davidson