In a recent development that caught the attention of both legal and entertainment communities in Nigeria, the Federal High Court has officially struck out the N1 billion defamation lawsuit filed by renowned human rights lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) and his son, popular rapper and activist Falz the Bahd Guy, against controversial social media commentator VeryDarkMan.
Background of the Case
Femi Falana and his son Falz filed the suit in response to accusations made by VeryDarkMan online, alleging that the Falana family had engaged in questionable activities or misled the public. The lawsuit demanded ₦1 billion in damages, claiming the statements were false, defamatory, and damaging to their reputation.
The Falana family, known for their public advocacy and activism, saw these allegations as a serious attack on their integrity and decided to approach the court to clear their names and seek compensation.
The Court’s Decision
However, in a surprising turn of events, the court struck out the case, essentially bringing it to a premature end without ruling in favor of either party. According to legal analysts, this outcome typically happens when the court finds issues with how the case was filed, or when the plaintiffs choose to withdraw the suit.
Although no detailed explanation has been given to the public, the court’s decision means that the N1 billion claim by Femi Falana and Falz has been dismissed, and no compensation will be awarded.
Public Reactions and Online Drama
The case had sparked a wave of reactions on social media, with fans and followers of both Falz and VeryDarkMan sharing their opinions. While some supported the Falana family for taking legal action, others argued that free speech on social media should not be criminalized—especially when it comes from influencers known for “calling out” public figures.
VeryDarkMan, who is known for his bold and unfiltered videos, has remained a controversial figure on the internet. His comments have often stirred strong responses, but this court decision may boost his confidence and public image even further.
What This Means Moving Forward
For many, the dismissal of this lawsuit raises questions about the legal boundaries of social media commentary, celebrity reputation, and the power of public opinion. It also highlights how challenging it can be to pursue defamation cases in a country where online content moves quickly and public perception plays a big role.
Though the Falana family has not publicly reacted to the court’s decision, it remains to be seen whether they will refile the case, appeal the ruling, or take a different route altogether.
This case is a reminder of how the digital age has blurred the lines between freedom of speech and defamation. As social media grows stronger as a tool for influence and information, public figures, activists, and commentators are increasingly finding themselves caught in legal battles over words spoken online.
Subscribe to Follow Global Trends for daily global news.
Find Out How To Make Money As A Full Time Writer/Blogger Guide.
To Advertise, Advertise Your Affiliate Links on FollowGlobalTrends.com for Just $1 Per Link Per Month!
Related Articles
Davido: The King of Endorsements in Africa
Wizkid Takes a Jab at Davido Again: Is There a Deeper Feud?
Davido Criticizes INEC Over Edo Gubernatorial Election, Explains His Interest
Davido sparks retirement rumors with recent statement
Davido Joins Forces with Nigerian Chess Prodigy, Tunde Onakoya in Bid for Guinness World Record
Meet The Richest Musician In Nigeria: Davido – $90 Million
An Intimate Photo Of Davido And Model Bonita Maria Leaked
Written By Fortune Davidson