In a recent interview, former Governor Nyesom Wike shared the story of how he made the decision to revoke a piece of land belonging to Julius Berger Nigeria, a major construction company, following a dinner meeting with the company’s managing director (MD). The revelation sheds light on how political figures can make crucial decisions based on personal experiences and observations.
The Context: Dinner with Julius Berger MD
During his tenure as the governor of Rivers State, Wike had several interactions with top executives of prominent companies operating in the state. One such occasion was a formal dinner with the managing director of Julius Berger Nigeria, a company known for its extensive infrastructural projects across the country. This meeting, however, took an unexpected turn when Wike made the decision to revoke a land allocated to the company.
Why the Land Was Revoked
Wike explained that his decision to revoke the land was influenced by the discussions that took place during the dinner. He mentioned that the MD of Julius Berger had assured him of the company’s commitment to developing the land but had not followed through on these promises. After realizing the lack of progress and seriousness, Wike decided to take swift action to reassign the land to another purpose that would benefit the state and its people.
Emphasizing Accountability
Wike’s revocation of the land highlights his stance on accountability and responsible use of public resources. He pointed out that it is crucial for companies benefiting from state resources to deliver on their promises and commitments. Failing to do so could lead to consequences, such as losing access to state-owned assets.
Julius Berger’s Reaction
The decision to revoke the land likely raised eyebrows, considering Julius Berger’s reputation and contribution to Nigeria’s infrastructure. However, Wike maintained that his action was necessary to ensure that public land is used effectively. He also emphasized that his decision was not a personal attack on the company but a reflection of his commitment to the people of Rivers State.
Ensuring Progress and Development
For Wike, it was important that land allocated by the state be used for meaningful development. Revoking Julius Berger’s land was, in his view, a way to guarantee that valuable public assets were not being wasted. The former governor has always been vocal about ensuring that projects benefit the people and are completed in a timely manner.
Lessons from the Decision
Wike’s story offers a glimpse into the complexities of governance and decision-making. It demonstrates how even informal interactions, such as a dinner meeting, can shape significant decisions that impact both the public and private sectors. His approach also highlights the need for corporate accountability in dealings with the government.
A Cautionary Tale for Corporations
The revocation of Julius Berger’s land serves as a cautionary tale for other companies working with government entities. It underscores the importance of following through on commitments, especially when public resources are involved. Wike’s decision reflects his broader philosophy of ensuring that the people’s interests come first in every aspect of governance.
Subscribe to Follow Global Trends for daily global news.
Find Out How To Make Money As A Full Time Writer/Blogger Guide.
To Advertise, Advertise Your Affiliate Links on FollowGlobalTrends.com for Just $1 Per Link Per Month!
Related Articles
Wike Responds to Atiku: “Nigerians Have Rejected You, Pack Up and Go”
Rivers LG Chairman Removes Wike’s Name from Council Building
Nyesom Wike Reacts to Rivers State Unrest: “Disregarding Court Judgements Invites Anarchy”
VeryDarkMan Challenges Wike’s Authority Over Protest Locations
Nyesom Wike: A Barrister, Former Governor, and Family Man
Federal Government Revokes Julius Berger’s Contract
Written By Fortune Davidson